Showing posts with label Charles Dalton. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Charles Dalton. Show all posts

Saturday, June 2, 2012

The Astroturf Incivility Lament

Some of you may remember the posts on this blog about the Dalton video, and of course, many of you know that "civility" has been used to try to keep people quiet around here.

Below is an email from the Department of Ecology. Is it odd that persons demanding civility post a blog article and anticipate less than civil responses? Could that be because they know the blog article is inflammatory? Just askin’.

Makes it seem like the whole public incivility lament has been an orchestrated red herring.


From: Stockdale, Erik (ECY) [mailto:ESTO461@ECY.WA.GOV]
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 8:36 AM
To: Richard Fralick; Lovel Pratt
Subject: blog article, Ecology response to Dalton case

Thought you might be interested in a blog article Gordon White posted yesterday evening regarding our role in the Dalton case.


I suspect some of the feedback will be less than civil.

Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions.

Cheers, Erik


Erik Stockdale, PWS |Wetlands/401 Unit Supervisor|Department of Ecology| 425-649-7061|  <mailto:esto461@ecy.wa.goverik.stockdale@ecy.wa.gov

Wednesday, April 4, 2012

How Many Ecology Employees Does It Take ...

Recent public records requests show the flurry of activity at Ecology when the Charles Dalton video surfaced. Ecology prepared a powerpoint presentation. They blogged about about the video. At one point, they had as many as 11 staff at all levels involved with developing a response. Eleven people! And what did Ecology's response say?  Well, in part, it said that Ecology had no authority in the matter at hand.

"We don’t have regulatory authority in local critical areas ordinance issues. We don’t make rulings or issue enforcement actions under local critical areas ordinances. Those tasks are on local government turf" (Gordon White, Eco-Connect Blog, Feburary 14, 2012.)

All that PR effort for a situation where they claim to have no authority?  The email below is just one example of the many emails related to this matter.  You can see there are eight people, including senior managers, involved in just one email.

The real question is why Ecology cares about their image in the first place. They're regulators, not movie stars. Yet, they have a blog, a Facebook page, and they seem to have a surfeit of "communications" staff.  Are they communications staff or publicists?

From: Anderson, Paul S. (ECY)
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 2:02 PM
To: Skipper, Katie (ECY)
Cc: Altose, Larry (ECY); Hart, Curt (ECY); Tallent, Geoff (ECY); Stockdale, Erik (ECY); Summerhays, Jeannie (ECY); White, Gordon (ECY)
Subject: RE: PLEASE REVIEW BLOG RESPONSE TO SJC YOUTUBE VIDEO

Katie:

Once again, thanks for your time with this.  I think it looks good.  I would suggest a couple of changes to the PowerPoint:

Slide 4, Bullet 1,  Wetland scientists educated and trained in wetland vegetation, soils and hydrology  [link to SWS-PWS Website?]
Slide 5, Bullet 1,  County asks for technical assistance

Paul

Paul S. Anderson, PWS Wetland Specialist Washington State Department of Ecology 3190 - 160th Ave. SE Bellevue, WA 98008 Phone: (425) 649-7148 Fax: (425) 649-7098 Email: paan461@ecy.wa.gov  

From: Skipper, Katie (ECY)
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 1:19 PM
To: Anderson, Paul S. (ECY); Tallent, Geoff (ECY); Stockdale, Erik (ECY); Summerhays, Jeannie (ECY); White, Gordon (ECY)
Cc: Altose, Larry (ECY); Hart, Curt (ECY)
Subject: PLEASE REVIEW BLOG RESPONSE TO SJC YOUTUBE VIDEO
Importance: High

Hi, all. Attached is a draft blog item and PowerPoint in response to the YouTube video about Charles Dalton’s property on Orcas. Below is our proposed strategy.

Forgive me for sending to all of you, but I’m not sure who to ask for approval, and it’s important that we post our reply promptly. The YouTube video now has 1,857 views. The Freedom Foundation has it posted on their website, too, http://www.myfreedomfoundation.com/index.php/site/view/friends_of_the_san_juans_offer_justification_for_harassing_local_islander, and the Island Guardian has a short item about it http://www.islandguardian.com/archives/00004240.html .

Strategy:
·         Post the blog on our blog site, link to YouTube.
·         Post a short response on the ChangeWA page referencing our video response.
·         Post PowerPoint with voiceover as a video response. The blog will be the basis for the script.
·         Link to on our FaceBook page with reference to the Friends of the San Juans response: http://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=10150544103742087&id=106592947086

Katie J. Skipper
Communications Manager
Bellingham Field Office
Washington Department of Ecology
Office: 360-715-5205
Cell: 360-510-0682


Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Friends Who Have Lost Their Way

The Friends had a meeting on Orcas Island this afternoon.  There will be a lot to say about that meeting in posts to come, but for now, I just want to convey one poignant thought voiced by several attendees.  The Friends have lost their way.

I used to be a member of the Friends, but I began to vigorously oppose them when I learned they were bullies.  At the meeting, many questioned why the Friends have been involved with enforcement actions.  Many wondered how the Friends could call for the enforcement of the law when they themselves admit to breaking the law (trespass). Some wondered why the Friends would pursue Charles Dalton, of all people, given apparently greater enforcement needs elsewhere in the community.

The meeting participants raised a lot of good questions, but it did not really seem to sink in with the Friends staff or Board members who were in attendance. The Friends firmly believe they have a role to play in enforcement, and during the meeting, they even made renewed pledges to help some attendees with fresh complaints.  None of the Friends really seemed to connect with the message that most of the audience was sending them.

I think it is important to point out that the urgently arranged Friends meeting today wasn't held because of an oil spill, corporate polluters, or a burning toxic waste dump. No. The County's premiere environmental organization called an emergency meeting not to discuss a dire Erin Brockovich-style eco-crisis, but to discuss a YouTube video that they dislike. My fundamental reaction is, "They're supposed to be an environmental organization for Pete's sake, what are they doing?" The Friends don't seem to be concerned about the environment. They seem more concerned about YouTube, "social media" as they invidiously referred to it during the meeting, self-image, grants, and generally-speaking, money. They care about community only when they want support from it, but it's a one-way street. The rest of the time, they seem to be trying to hurt the community.

The Friends have lost their way.

Tuesday, February 21, 2012

Who Would Gandhi Beat Up?

Read the email at the bottom of this post and ask yourself if the Mahatma would have gone after Charles Dalton? What about Rosa Parks? I wonder if Stephanie Buffum earns 86% of what Charles earns? The email is from the Director of the "Friends" to one of her friends working for the County. Just a few months after this email, Stephanie started going after Charles.

Gandhi, Rosa Parks, MLK were, of course, notorious law breakers of unjust laws. Since the Dalton video broke, I've heard some defend the "Friends" actions by saying that Charles broke the law, and for them, that's all that matters. We should, of course, obey just laws. However, one difficulty the average citizen faces nowadays is that our laws have become so convoluted that it can be impossible to know how to follow them. We often don't know when we're breaking the law, and we don't know that we have to disprove something just to live our lives on our own property.

When Stephanie "The Mahatma" Buffum reported Charles for building in a wetland and along a stream, that was before any report of a wetland or stream on Charles' property existed.  In other words, she claimed there was a wetland and stream, and then the wheels of "justice" turned to make her self-fulfilling prophecy stick. As for whether it is or is not a wetland and stream, there are conflicting scientific studies in that regard. One study was authored by someone with no science degree, and the other was authored by someone licensed by the State in a scientific discipline (and two scientific subspecialties) and with degrees in science. Guess which one the Department of Ecology chose?

If we are to respect the law, then we must all follow it equally. We cannot have a situation where some are more equal than others. Many feel the wheels of justice work differently for well-connected "Friends" here. They often seem to be different for County and State officials too.  When reports come in that County and State officials were trespassing on Charles Dalton's property and even inside his buildings without his permission, that deserves scrutiny. When Ecology and the County pay no attention to the Geology Licensing Laws, that deserves scrutiny. County and State officials should not be above the law.

Lastly, I would venture to say that many San Juan County residents have something out of place on their property at this very moment, and they may not even be aware of it. When the CAOs and SMP go into effect, complicated as they are, there will be many more "sleeper" violations just waiting for a complaint from our self-styled Mahatma to pick on. As the email below suggests, their cause is just, so you may be in for it, even if they have to break the law to prove it. After all, you're just a Charles Dalton, and they're Gandhi.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Stephanie Buffum [mailto:stephanie@sanjuans.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 2:41 PM
To: Barbara Rosenkotter
Subject: CAO - unplugged

It’s not often that I rant, but I need to among friends…

I went to an Anti-Critical Areas Ordinance meeting and dinner last night at the San Juan Grange...there were 90 people there! I know at least 3 of the people as we had seen each other in court a few times on landuse issues. There was a panel of 9 people representing members of the: Common Sense Alliance (Mike Carlson); CAPR(Citizens’ Alliance for Property Rights – Frank Penwell, Richard Civille and Steve Cotton (the former Republic Chair for SJC), the SJ Builders Association (Gordy Peterson/John Evans); SJ Realtors Association (Sam Buck); and private landuse attorney Stephanie O'Day and her staff planner Francine Shaw.

The meeting was supposed to be a balanced discussion, but no one with alternative opinions were invited to sit on the panel. The orca, salmon, sea birds, surf smelt, eelgrass, wetlands, water were no represented on the panel.

Main presenter themes were:

· Don't bother me with the biology or facts.
· There’s no biological problem in SJ County.
· No one believes that their property is a source for pollution.
· Private property owners don’t want pay for protection of the environment.
· Write to your elected officials tell them to protect your private property.
· Govt is taking all your property without compensation.

The meeting was insightful to the human condition and the power of fear and greed...Here's what I learned:

· About 90 people took the time to attend.
· The group felt defensive and many fronts: backlash from the presidential election,

   backlash from the economic turning, personal loss at so many level;
· Most of the people were concerned about the financial burden of protecting the
   environment.
· I think most people left with the same amount of information they arrived with…little.

After attending meeting like last night, I can better understand…

· why some took to arms to preserve slavery
· how Germans in WWII sat in complacency against their own government while millions

  of Jewish people were killed.
· how Japanese Americans were detained during WWII while non Japanese American
  stood idle.
· why people were moved to take action in 1968 and assassinate MLK, Jr and Kennedy.
· why women still make 86 cents to the $1 that a man makes.

I can better understand why Rosa Parks sat in the front of the bus and MLK, and Gandhi sat in, sat down, and Rachel Carson and Terry Tempest Williams took to the pen.

I appreciate you and your service to preserve this amazing place we reside.

The opposition is well organized, we need to get ourselves better organized. We are trying to get letters into the editor weekly and calls to elected councilors. We need to communicate common values and common sense to protect this place for another 40 years. Our values are so closely tied to human preferences which are manifested wholistically. An integration of place, ethics, religion, sexuality, beauty and economics. Attempts to focus exclusively on an “economic” value that value monetarily will generally fail to adequately represent culture, community and aesthetic values.

The future needs all of our voices…. Calls and letters to friends, family, neighbors, and our elected officials.

The County council especially needs to hear from all of us often and frequently through November on why we value living here in the San Juans and what we want in our community.

And we support the CAO with some modifications. The CAO is a C+ and meets the minimum standards. It needs some modifications for sure, but we can articulate that it is something worth defending.

· Lovel Pratt (Dist 1 SJ South) 370-7473 LovelP@co.san-juan.wa.us
· Rich Peterson (Dist 2 SJI North) 378-2898 richp@co.san-juan.wa.us
· Howie Rosenfeld (Dist 3 Town of Friday Harbor) 378-5788 howier@co.san-juan.wa.us
· Richard Fralick (Dist 4 West Orcas) 370-7473 richardf@sanjuanco.com
· Gene Knapp (Dist 5 West Orcas East) 378-2898 genek@co.san-juan.wa.us
· Bob Myhr (Dist. 6) 378-2898 or 468-2258; myhr@rockisland.com or BobM@co.san-juan.wa.us

Cheers, Stephanie Buffum


Sunday, February 19, 2012

When Can SHE Expect a Final Decision?

I thought Charles was the one awaiting a final decision?  Who is working for whom?

From: Stephanie Buffum [mailto:stephanie@sanjuans.org]
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 12:30 PM
To: Rene Beliveau
Subject: Hawkins Road Follow up

Dear Rene,

I am writing to follow up on my telephone messages to you earlier this month and to thank you for investigating the unpermitted streamside construction at Hawkins Rd, a matter we have been tracking since January of 2010.

I understand that you have received two wetland reports from the landowner, the first concluding that a recently-constructed building is in a wetland buffer and the second determining that there are no wetlands in the vicinity of the building. I also understand that a representative from the Department of Ecology has reviewed both wetland reports and has let the County know that the second report was performed incorrectly. In light of that information, and out of fairness to those San Juan County residents who ask that the planning department to enforce its rules with all residents, including those who apply for permits before construction, I presume that the County will require the landowner to address wetland impacts.

Can you tell me when I can expect a final decision from the County and who at the County will be issuing this decision?

Sincerely,


Stephanie
Stephanie Buffum Field
Executive Director
FRIENDS OF THE SAN JUANS

Saturday, February 18, 2012

Who is Charles Dalton?

If you haven't yet, you need to see the video about Charles Dalton. The "Friends" and Sharon Kivisto of the online news site, www.sanjuanislander.com, have responded by saying that it portrays a law-breaker as a victim. We believe that is the kind of unforgiving, heartless rhetoric that we have come to expect, and which we are against. Besides, if "they" have their way, we will be subject to so many new environmental requirements that there is no way we average joes will be able to avoid at least some kind of minor violation, for something. They'll target us for having committed some minor victimless crime and then use the legal system to persecute us while the eco-noise machine discredits us, one by one -- painting us as "developers" committing crimes against nature and saying we deserve no mercy. Meanwhile, whether we actually caused any harm will be overlooked and forgotten.  We are all Charles Dalton.

Watch the Charles Dalton Video and read what Nick Jones has to say about Sharon Kivisto's reporting on the situation.